Returning to · film essay

Coffee and Cigarettes.
Not a review. A returning-to. Jim Jarmusch, 2003, and the disappearance of conversations that go nowhere.
I returned to this film during the week the office closed. I hadn’t planned to. It arrived the way most re-reading arrives — by accident, at the exact moment I had run out of appetite for anything new.
Coffee and Cigarettes is not a film about coffee, or cigarettes, or even really about conversation. It is a film about the willingness to sit still with another person while nothing particularly happens.
Waiting.
On the way each vignette begins in a small, almost embarrassing lull. Two people arriving. A cup being placed. A beat before either speaks. The film trusts the lull.
Conversation.
On the difference between the — efficient, prepared, endlessly editable — and the conversations the film records: wandering, faintly awkward, sometimes petty, occasionally luminous. Almost all of them a little longer than they need to be.
“Conversation begins where efficiency ends.”
Silence.
On the way is not empty. It is a shared surface on which something might land — a . The film never explains this. It simply refuses to fill the gaps.
I returned to this film three summers later.
Black and white.
On the way removing colour removes urgency. The world without red becomes considerably less loud.
Friendship.
The film keeps returning, in its patient way, to a single quiet premise: that friendship is only rarely the exchange of important information. It is more often the shared willingness to spend an , and to leave slightly changed by the way that hour rearranged the room.
“Perhaps friendship is simply the willingness to waste time together.”
Time.
The strangest thing about the film in 2026 is not its content. It is its pace. Watching it is a small act of resistance against every product we now use, all of which have been quietly optimised to make sure no conversation is ever this slow again.
Elsewhere in this issue
The Long Afternoon